06 Toxicology and ecotoxicology

Hazard is a curve, not a label.

Toxicity is a relationship between dose and effect, across species, over time and through the environment. This chapter covers dose–response models, species sensitivity distributions, persistence and bioaccumulation screening, flammability classification and the route from cell assays to human dose.

Computed for this page Published data Chronic EC50 values for four to six species per liquid from the founder’s 2016 study (ES&T Table 1; dots, squares for censored values). Each strip is a log-normal species sensitivity distribution fitted here; color is the fraction of species whose chronic EC50 is exceeded at that concentration. With so few species, HC5 is an extrapolation.

You will see

  • Dose–response (log-logistic) models and ECx
  • Acute-to-chronic extrapolation
  • Species sensitivity distributions, HC50 and HC5
  • A PBT screen computed on published inputs
  • Flammability categories, and why an ionic liquid is not automatically non-flammable

Labs in this chapter

6.1 Hazard and risk

Hazard is a substance’s intrinsic capacity to cause harm; risk combines hazard with exposure. Design can lower both: choose ions with lower intrinsic toxicity, and design processes that recover the solvent so little reaches people or water. The founder’s 2016 study found that, for five common ionic liquids and under its release assumptions, modeled freshwater ecotoxicity from making the liquid was nearly an order of magnitude larger than from its release during use. Precursor and route choices can therefore matter as much as the ion itself.

6.2 Dose–response

Concentration–effect data are commonly described by a log-logistic (Hill) curve. The effect at concentration c rises from 0 to Emax:

E(c) = Emax1 + (EC50/c)h,    ECx = EC50 (x100 − x)1/h
(6.1)

h: slope (Hill coefficient); ECx: concentration giving x% effect. A steep curve means EC10 is close to EC50; a shallow one means effects start far below it.

Lab 6.1 Methodology

Dose–response explorer

Equation 6.1 with adjustable EC50 and slope. Inputs only; not fitted to a specific substance.

6.3 From acute tests to chronic values

Many endpoints are short-term (acute) EC50 or LC50 values, while life-cycle characterization needs chronic values. In the founder’s 2016 USEtox study, acute data were converted to chronic with an acute-to-chronic ratio of 2 (following USEtox guidance), and no-observed-effect concentrations were extrapolated to EC50 by a factor of 9. Such factors are conventions; they carry uncertainty that should travel with the result.

6.4 Species sensitivity distributions

Species differ in sensitivity. A species sensitivity distribution (SSD) treats the chronic EC50 values of tested species as a sample from a log-normal distribution:

F(c) = Φ(log10 c − μs),    HCp = 10μ + zps,    HC50 = 10μ
(6.2)

μ, s: mean and standard deviation of log10 EC50 across species; zp: standard normal quantile (z0.05 = −1.645). HC50 is the geometric mean; HC5 is the concentration at which 5% of species are exposed above their chronic EC50.

USEtox builds its freshwater effect factor from the HC50, and the characterization factor from fate, exposure and effect (USEtox 1.01 manual):

EF = 0.5HC50  [PAF m3 kg−1],    CF = FF × XF × EF  [CTUe kg−1]
(6.3)

Lab 6.2 Computed for this page Published data

Species sensitivity distributions for five ionic liquids

Chronic EC50 values from the founder’s 2016 ES&T study (Table 1). The curve is a log-normal fit computed here; HC50 is compared with the published value and EF is recomputed with Eq. 6.3.

Four to six species per liquid, so HC5 is an extrapolation with wide uncertainty; it is shown to illustrate the method, not as a protective threshold. Values built from censored source entries (fish LC50 ≥ 100 mg L−1; Daphnia NOEC > 3.2 mg L−1) are used at their bounds; squares mark the fish values set to 50 mg L−1.

6.5 Persistence and bioaccumulation: a PBT screen

Under REACH Annex XIII, a substance is PBT if it meets all three criteria. Persistent: degradation half-life above 60 days in marine water, 40 days in fresh or estuarine water, 180 days in marine sediment, or 120 days in fresh or estuarine water sediment or in soil. Bioaccumulative: bioconcentration factor (BCF) above 2,000. Toxic: long-term NOEC or EC10 below 0.01 mg L−1 for aquatic organisms, or classification as carcinogenic, mutagenic or toxic for reproduction (categories 1A/1B; reproductive category 2 also counts), or specific target organ toxicity after repeated exposure (STOT RE 1 or 2). Very persistent (vP) and very bioaccumulative (vB) use stricter values (half-life above 60 days in water and 180 days in sediment or soil; BCF above 5,000).

Since 2023 the EU CLP Regulation also has hazard classes for persistent, mobile and toxic (PMT) and very persistent, very mobile (vPvM) substances, which matter for water-soluble ions. Mobility is judged from the organic carbon–water partition coefficient: M if log Koc < 3, vM if log Koc < 2. The 2016 paper’s Koc values (log Koc 2.15–2.60) meet M but not vM for all five liquids; a PMT conclusion would also need the P and T criteria.

PBT screen computed from the inputs published in the 2016 ES&T study (its Tables 1–2)

Half-life t½ = ln 2 / k from the paper’s first-order biodegradation rates in water; the paper assigned 1 × 10−20 s−1 (effectively no degradation) to liquids it classed as nonbiodegradable. The persistence entries marked “potentially P” are liquids with less than 1% degradation in 28 days, a failed screening test rather than a measured half-life. The bioaccumulation column uses the paper’s fish bioaccumulation factors, estimated from Kow, as a stand-in for BCF; Kow-based regressions were developed for neutral organics and are not validated for ions. The toxicity column compares the lowest chronic EC50 with 0.01 mg L−1, which is indicative only, because the criterion is defined on NOEC or EC10. A screen on model inputs is not a regulatory assessment.

6.6 Flammability

Under the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (Appendix B.6), a flammable liquid has a flash point at or below 93 °C, in four categories:

Flammable-liquid categories, OSHA HCS Table B.6.1
CategoryCriteria
1Flash point < 23 °C and initial boiling point ≤ 35 °C
2Flash point < 23 °C and initial boiling point > 35 °C
3Flash point ≥ 23 °C and ≤ 60 °C
4Flash point > 60 °C and ≤ 93 °C

Negligible vapor pressure makes most ionic liquids hard to ignite as liquids, but it does not make them non-combustible. Smiglak and co-workers (2006) reported that while many ionic liquids are not flammable themselves, a large group, including commercial ones, are combustible, owing to positive heats of formation, oxygen content and decomposition products. Flammability is therefore a criterion to test, not to assume (Chapter 5, Eq. 5.6).

6.7 Human health: from cells to dose

Human-health assessment runs from computational alerts, through in vitro assays (including human cell lines), to in vivo studies where regulation requires them; the OECD test guidelines for each tier are listed in Methods 06. In vitro potency becomes a human dose through in vitro–in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) and physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models, whose equations are given there. Carcinogenicity classifications (IARC groups) apply to precursors and by-products as well as to the product.

References

  1. Mehrkesh, A.; Karunanithi, A. T. Life-cycle perspectives on aquatic ecotoxicity of common ionic liquids. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 6814–6821. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b04721
  2. Posthuma, L.; Suter, G. W., II; Traas, T. P., eds. Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology. CRC Press, 2002. doi:10.1201/9781420032314
  3. Rosenbaum, R. K.; et al. USEtox—the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2008, 13, 532–546. doi:10.1007/s11367-008-0038-4; USEtox User Manual, version 1.01 (2010).
  4. Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH), Annex XIII, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 253/2011. eur-lex.europa.eu
  5. OSHA 29 CFR 1910.1200, Appendix B.6. osha.gov
  6. Smiglak, M.; et al. Combustible ionic liquids by design: is laboratory safety another ionic liquid myth? Chem. Commun. 2006, (24), 2554–2556. doi:10.1039/b602086k
  7. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/707 of 19 December 2022 amending Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 (CLP) as regards hazard classes and criteria for the classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (Annex I, sections 4.3–4.4). eur-lex.europa.eu

Privacy

Terms